 [1623]Re:Re:Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) (286 reads) |
2002-03-06 22:34:10 |
Generally, I agree with the premise, that one shouldn't be at their "maximum performable tempo" when performing a given piece of music, but I think that spending the time and energy to get the third movement of the Creston Concertino up to mm=120 is a little more than is necessary. My suggestion to Joe: find some recordings of the Creston, determine an approximate range of tempos suitable for performance of the movement, and if you want to take it up a notch or two just for the sake of having it under your hands, go a couple of clicks up on the metronome. IMHO, learning the movement at mm=120 when one is going to perform it at mm=100-105 is taking the concept a little further than is necessary. As always, YMMV. http://www.malletjazz.com Remote Host: |
 [1607]Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) <Joe> |
2002-02-27 10:31:55 |
 [1609]Re:Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) <James Walker> |
2002-02-27 11:55:06 |
 [1614]Re:Re:Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) <tidus> |
2002-03-02 12:16:44 |
| [1754]Re:Re:Re:Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) <Ben> |
2002-04-15 12:10:14 |
| [1620]Re:Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) <ben> |
2002-03-06 05:19:17 |
| [1623]Re:Re:Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) <James Walker> |
2002-03-06 22:34:10 |
| [1621]Re:Creston Concerto 3rd movement (lively) <Mike Newland> |
2002-03-06 09:10:19 |