[5288]Tuning: 440 VS 442? (525 reads)	2007-03-27 04:15:37

Mont Joined: 2006-6-12 From: Posts: 27 Hey all, Why is 442 the standard now? why not 440? I don't mind scientific/historical details if it helps. Mike. Remote Host: minielf3.douglas.bc.ca

[5288]Tuning: 440 VS 442? <Mont>	2007-03-27 04:15:37
[5289]Re:Tuning: 440 VS 442? <William Moersch>	2007-03-29 11:46:34
[5291]Re:Re:Tuning: 440 VS 442? <JRichards>	2007-03-30 08:38:19