More explanation required from both side.

[967]More explanation required from both side. (315 reads)	2001-05-12 12:40:04

Nat Sakimura

Joined: 2005-2-12

From: Tokyo

Posts: 300

Good that you have replied. I was wondering because I did not get any reply from you for a while. Since Office such dobut seems to be lingering about, however, I think you had better write more complete explanation of what is happening. Also, Office / N.J. Zivkovic should write back the rply to it so that the people who read this thread can come up with their own picture of what is going on.

There is no way for the member of this bbs to reach a definitive conclusion, but if "caution" message seems likely to be bogus, I am obliged to anounce that to protect his credit. IMHO, that's what this community have to do. What Mr. Heynes must do is to convince the community.

Mr. Zivkovic side also need to do more explanation. I tend to agree with Mr. Adler's comment [962]. Like I wrote in [961], I did not send out any material, and I would not unless the payment is checked with the financial institution. I think that is a usual business practice. If that is the case, the damage should be near zero. We get the impression that it was not the case. Some more explanation is needed on this respect as well.

Regards,

Nat Sakimura

Remote Host: